Ensure syntax highlighting is the same inside diffs (#12205)
Make sure to end up with the same syntax highlighting inside various sections of diffs by processing the code first before detecting specific changes between the lines. Also try and make sure that when highlighting individual lines in a diff that it is tokenized the same as it would be when part of an entire file with more context. Fixes: #12190
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a62884782
commit
8d081950e6
2 changed files with 12 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -188,14 +188,14 @@ func diffToHTML(fileName string, diffs []diffmatchpatch.Diff, lineType DiffLineT
|
|||
switch {
|
||||
case diffs[i].Type == diffmatchpatch.DiffInsert && lineType == DiffLineAdd:
|
||||
buf.Write(addedCodePrefix)
|
||||
buf.WriteString(highlight.Code(fileName, diffs[i].Text))
|
||||
buf.WriteString(getLineContent(diffs[i].Text))
|
||||
buf.Write(codeTagSuffix)
|
||||
case diffs[i].Type == diffmatchpatch.DiffDelete && lineType == DiffLineDel:
|
||||
buf.Write(removedCodePrefix)
|
||||
buf.WriteString(highlight.Code(fileName, diffs[i].Text))
|
||||
buf.WriteString(getLineContent(diffs[i].Text))
|
||||
buf.Write(codeTagSuffix)
|
||||
case diffs[i].Type == diffmatchpatch.DiffEqual:
|
||||
buf.WriteString(highlight.Code(fileName, getLineContent(diffs[i].Text)))
|
||||
buf.WriteString(getLineContent(diffs[i].Text))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return template.HTML(buf.Bytes())
|
||||
|
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ func (diffSection *DiffSection) GetComputedInlineDiffFor(diffLine *DiffLine) tem
|
|||
return template.HTML(highlight.Code(diffSection.FileName, diffLine.Content))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diffRecord := diffMatchPatch.DiffMain(diff1[1:], diff2[1:], true)
|
||||
diffRecord := diffMatchPatch.DiffMain(highlight.Code(diffSection.FileName, diff1[1:]), highlight.Code(diffSection.FileName, diff2[1:]), true)
|
||||
diffRecord = diffMatchPatch.DiffCleanupEfficiency(diffRecord)
|
||||
return diffToHTML(diffSection.FileName, diffRecord, diffLine.Type)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue