git724/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4
22714 commits 5 branches 0 tags 329 MiB
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
forgejo-backport-action
e286457990 [v11.0/forgejo] chore: branding import path (#7354) 
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7337

- Massive replacement of changing `code.gitea.io/gitea` to `forgejo.org`.
- Resolves forgejo/discussions#258

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7354
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
 2025-03-27 20:13:05 +00:00
delvh
778ad795fd
Refactor deletion (#28610) 
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`

So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.

Replacement of #28450

Closes #28450

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
 2023-12-25 21:25:29 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084) 
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
 2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
KN4CK3R
a99b96cbcd
Refactor secrets modification logic (#26873) 
- Share code between web and api
- Add some tests
 2023-09-05 15:21:02 +00:00